Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 202
Filter
1.
Rom J Ophthalmol ; 68(1): 31-36, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38617719

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To report patients who first presented with various ocular manifestations and eventually ascertained to have underlying dengue. Methods: A prospective study was conducted at multiple tertiary eye-care centers in India from 2012 to 2022. Cases reporting initially with ocular features along with fever/past history of fever over the last two weeks or with clinical features of dengue were selected. After an ophthalmological examination, patients underwent complete serological and biochemical analysis and those with reduced platelet counts were evaluated for dengue. Results: Out of 564 cases, 15 patients were verified to be afflicted with dengue eventually. A rising trend of cases was seen every year and out of 15 cases, eight cases were reported during the Covid-19 pandemic (from 2020 to 2022), but were COVID-negative. 9 cases presented with acute redness followed by diminished vision. Seven cases presented a history of fever over the last few days and one had traveled from dengue endemic area. The various ocular presentations included subconjunctival hemorrhage, viral keratitis, anterior uveitis, sixth-nerve palsy, and vitreous hemorrhage. On serological examination, all 15 patients were detected to have low platelets. All cases responded well with supportive treatment and the ocular features subsided in all within a couple of weeks with good visual recovery. Conclusion: In a tropical nation, such as India, with endemic dengue zones and increasing figures of dengue lately, ophthalmologists must include dengue fever among the differential diagnoses in various ocular presentations like subconjunctival hemorrhage, viral keratitis, anterior uveitis, sixth nerve palsy, and vitreous hemorrhage. Abbreviations: DHF = dengue hemorrhagic fever, PCR = polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR = real-time automated reverse transcriptase (RT-PCR), SD = standard deviation, MAC-ELIS = IgM antibodies capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, RE = right eye, LE = left eye, CECT = Contrast-enhanced computed tomography.


Subject(s)
Abducens Nerve Diseases , Dengue , Eye Infections, Viral , Keratitis , Uveitis, Anterior , Humans , Vitreous Hemorrhage , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Eye Infections, Viral/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Dengue/complications , Dengue/diagnosis , Dengue/epidemiology
2.
Jpn J Ophthalmol ; 68(1): 57-63, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38017339

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To explore the clinical features of COVID-19-associated conjunctivitis with the objective of preventing the spread of infection. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: From March 2020 to March 2021, we retrospectively reviewed 26 (9.8%) consecutive COVID-19 patients with conjunctivitis among 282 COVID-19 cases admitted to our hospital. Clinical symptoms, onset date of conjunctivitis, time to patient recovery, and eye drop intervention were investigated. In addition, risk factors for developing conjunctivitis were statistically examined among 206 inpatients available for within 5 days of the onset. A multivariate analysis of conjunctivitis risk factors was performed. RESULTS: Among the 282 COVID-19 patients, 4 (1.4%) had conjunctival hyperemia as the primary symptom. The median time of onset was 4 days after the COVID-19 onset. Hyperemia was observed in all cases, but other ocular symptoms were rare. The median duration of hyperemia was 3 days. A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that a young age (p=0.005) and current smoking habit (p=0.027) were independent risk factors for conjunctivitis after COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19-associated conjunctivitis is rare in the elderly and strongly associated with a history of smoking. It often occurs in the early stages of infection, and while hyperemia is recognized as a clinical symptom, other ocular symptoms are rare or non-existent. Many cases recover within a short time.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Conjunctivitis , Eye Infections, Viral , Hyperemia , Humans , Aged , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Hyperemia/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis/epidemiology , Conjunctivitis/etiology , Eye Infections, Viral/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology
3.
Ocul Immunol Inflamm ; 31(4): 778-784, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35394858

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The ongoing coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has greatly impacted theworld. In this review article, we discuss the conjunctival and nasolacrimal mucosa as a potential route for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission, its ocular manifestations, and management. METHODS: Literature review was conducted in the PubMed, Google Scholar and EMBASE databases using keywords such as "coronavirus", COVID-19", "SARS-CoV-2", "conjunctivitis", "ocular surface", "eye" and "ophthalmology". RESULTS: The ocular surface may serve as an entry point and reservoir for the virus. Frequency of hand-eye contact was an independent risk factor for COVID-19-related conjunctivitis. Therefore, appropriate protective eyewear or face shields are recommended, especially for health-care workers. Bilateral conjunctival sampling within 9 days of symptom onset provides a higher positive yield rate. Pooled analysis shows an incidence of 11.4% (95%CI = 6.4-17.2%) of ocular manifestations in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, including hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. CONCLUSION: Conjunctivitis was the most common ocular manifestation, of which ocular redness or congestion, ocular pain, and follicular conjunctivitis were the most common presentation.COVID-19-related conjunctivitis has a self-limiting disease course, and treatment should be mainly supportive.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Conjunctivitis , Eye Infections, Viral , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Conjunctivitis/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis/epidemiology , Conjunctivitis/therapy , Conjunctiva , Eye Infections, Viral/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Viral/therapy
4.
Jpn J Ophthalmol ; 67(1): 22-31, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36346554

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To elucidate detailed epidemiological profile of common types of anterior uveitis (AU) in real-world clinical setting of a tertiary facility in Japan, and to evaluate the characteristic clinical findings at initial presentation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Clinical charts of 275 patients (335 eyes) aged 52.5 ± 19.1 years were reviewed retrospectively. Herpetic AU was diagnosed by multiplex polymerase chain reaction tests using aqueous humor. Time of uveitis onset, gender, laterality, disease course since the initial onset of AU, visual acuity (VA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) at first visit, and definitive diagnosis were collected from clinical charts. RESULTS: Acute AU (AAU) was the most common (21.8%) form of AU; followed by herpetic AU (20.7%) comprising Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) (8.0%), Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV) (9.1%) and cytomegalo virus (CMV) (3.6%); scleritis (13.5%); diabetic iritis (7.6%), and Posner-Schlossman syndrome (5.5%). Unilateral AU constituted 78.2%, and VA less than 20/30 accounted for 31.2%. Of all the eyes, 16.1% had an IOP higher than 20 mmHg, out of which 37.0% had herpetic AU, followed by scleritis in 25.9%, and Posner-Schlossman syndrome (PSS) in 11.1%. AU patients over 60 years of age were 40.4%, in which 34.2% had herpetic AU, followed by scleritis in 14.4% and AAU in 13.5%. Herpetic AU patients were significantly older and had higher IOP compared with AAU patients. CONCLUSION: The most frequent AU was AAU, followed by herpetic AU. Herpetic AU patients were older and had higher intraocular pressure than AAU patients, although VA was equally impaired in both groups.


Subject(s)
Eye Infections, Viral , Glaucoma, Open-Angle , Glaucoma , Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus , Scleritis , Uveitis, Anterior , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Eye Infections, Viral/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Japan/epidemiology , Herpesvirus 3, Human/genetics , Uveitis, Anterior/diagnosis , Uveitis, Anterior/epidemiology , Acute Disease , Aqueous Humor , DNA, Viral/analysis
5.
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed) ; 97(5): 251-263, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35526949

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-infectious retinal disease, even in the HAART era, continues to be one of the most common diagnoses in patients with HIV, with prevalences of up to 27% of cases. This study aims to characterize the association between demographic variables and their role. As a risk factor for the development of non-opportunistic non-infectious retinal disease in patients with HIV/AIDS. METHODS: An integrative review of the literature was carried out according to Arksey O'Malley's approach, based on the PICO methodology and following the PRISMA recommendations; An exhaustive search was carried out in databases of articles that were filtered using established criteria, with their extraction and analysis carried out qualitatively. RESULTS: Ocular manifestations from any cause develop from 35 years of age in patients with HIV/AIDS, with the highest risk for age-related macular degeneration over the fourth decade of life and for the development of neuroretinal disorder on the fifth decade of life; some studies report a slight tendency to diagnose macular degeneration in women and those who acquired AIDS through sexual contact; data contrasted with increased risk for diagnosing neuroretinal disorder in homosexual men who also use intravenous drugs, possibly due to oversampling in studies; non-Hispanic whites and African Americans were the races most commonly affected by neuroretinal disease; the means between the 11.3-14.5 years elapsed since the HIV diagnosis were more frequently associated with cognitive impairment and both in those with high or low CD4 counts, and in patients with high or low viral loads, neuroretinal disease without Statistically significant differences. Adherence and early initiation of HAART had a modest impact on the development of neuroretinal disease. DISCUSSION: Even in the HAART era, non-infectious neuroretinal disease and cytomegalovirus retinitis remain the most frequent ocular diagnoses, however, different studies argue an increase in age-related non-infectious retinal diseases in patients with HIV, theories that are may explain by the increase in life expectancy, the metabolic effects of HAART itself or the generalized pro-inflammatory state in this group of patients, it is essential to recognize this new diagnostic challenge in order to direct preventive efforts through the use of cost-effective sociodemographic risk predictors towards that technological tools for diagnosis and treatment can be targeted. CONCLUSIONS: HIV/AIDS patients who present at the ophthalmological consultation with the suggested sociodemographic predictors have a high risk of visual impairment due to non-infectious retinopathy, therefore prevention, diagnosis and treatment efforts directed at these diseases should be increased.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , Eye Infections, Viral , Retinal Diseases , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/complications , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/drug therapy , Adolescent , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/adverse effects , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Child , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Retinal Diseases/drug therapy , Retinal Diseases/epidemiology , Retinal Diseases/etiology
6.
Retina ; 42(2): 236-243, 2022 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35050927

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Retinal manifestations have been described in COVID-19 patients, but it is unknown whether SARS-CoV-2, the causal agent in COVID-19, can directly infect posterior ocular tissues. Here, we investigate SARS-CoV-2 host factor gene expression levels and their distribution across retinal and choroidal cell types. METHODS: Query of single-cell RNA sequencing data from human retina and choroid. RESULTS: We find no relevant expression of two key genes involved in SARS-CoV-2 entry, ACE2 and TMPRSS2, in retinal cell types. By contrast, scarce expression levels could be detected in choroidal vascular cells. CONCLUSION: Given the current understanding of viral host cell entry, these findings suggest a low vulnerability of the posterior eye segment to SARS-CoV-2 with a potential weak spot in the vasculature, which could play a putative causative role in ocular lesions in COVID-19 patients. This may qualify the vasculature of the human posterior eye segment as an in vivo biomarker for life-threatening vascular occlusions in COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Viral/virology , Gene Expression Regulation, Viral , Posterior Eye Segment/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Serine Endopeptidases/genetics , Virus Internalization , COVID-19/virology , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Viral/pathology , Humans , Posterior Eye Segment/pathology , RNA, Viral/genetics , Retinal Ganglion Cells/pathology , Retinal Ganglion Cells/virology , Serine Endopeptidases/biosynthesis
7.
Cornea ; 41(3): 339-346, 2022 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34743092

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the medical history of adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis (AK) and subepithelial infiltrates (SEIs) among French ophthalmologists and orthoptists and the frequency of unreported occupational diseases. We also described short-term and long-term consequences of AK and evaluated associated factors. METHODS: The REDCap questionnaire was diffused online several times over 7 consecutive months, from October 2019 to May 2020, through mailing lists (French Society of Ophthalmology, residents, and hospital departments), social networks, and by word of mouth. RESULTS: Seven hundred ten participants were included with a response rate of 6.2% for ophthalmologists, 3.8% for orthoptists, and 28.3% for ophthalmology residents. The medical history of AK was found in 24.1% (95% confidence interval 21%-27.2%) of respondents and SEI in 43.9% (36.5%-51.3%) of the AK population. In total, 87.1% (82.1%-92.1%) of AK occupational diseases were not declared. In total, 57.7% of respondents took 9.4 ± 6.2 days of sick leave, mostly unofficial, and 95.7% stopped surgeries for 13.0 ± 6.6 days. Among the AK population, 39.8% had current sequelae, with 17.5% having persistent SEIs, 19.9% using current therapy, and 16.4% experiencing continuing discomfort. SEIs were associated with wearing contact lenses (odds ratio 3.31, 95% confidence interval 1.19-9.21) and smoking (4.07, 1.30-12.8). Corticosteroid therapy was associated with a greater number of sequelae (3.84, 1.51-9.75). CONCLUSIONS: AK and SEI affect a large proportion of ophthalmologists and orthoptists, possibly for years, with high morbidity leading to occupational discomfort. Few practitioners asked for either to be recognized as an occupational disease. Associated factors would require a dedicated study.


Subject(s)
Adenovirus Infections, Human/complications , Eye Infections, Viral/complications , Keratoconjunctivitis/complications , Ophthalmologists/statistics & numerical data , Orthoptics/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/methods , Vision, Low/etiology , Adenovirus Infections, Human/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , France/epidemiology , Humans , Keratoconjunctivitis/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity/trends , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Vision, Low/epidemiology , Visual Acuity , Young Adult
8.
Ocul Immunol Inflamm ; 30(2): 297-309, 2022 Feb 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33617392

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Viral agents are the most common cause of infectious anterior uveitis worldwide. The purpose of this review is to analyze the frequency, gender and racial differences of viral anterior uveitis (VAU) in various populations. METHODS: Systematized literature review of epidemiological reports of VAU cited in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library database published until June 30th, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 12 clinical studies on epidemiology of definite VAU and 36 clinical studies of presumed VAU were identified. Members of Herpesviridae family represent the most common causes of VAU. Other less frequently reported causes, such as rubella and endemic viruses (HTLV-1, Chikungunya, Dengue, Ebola, Zika virus) were also analyzed. CONCLUSION: HSV, VZV are prevalent worldwide. CMV is more frequent in Asia, and rubella in the West. However, due to globalization and air travel, HTLV-1, Chikungunya, Dengue and Ebola may become important causes of VAU across the world.


Subject(s)
Chikungunya Fever , Dengue , Eye Infections, Viral , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola , Rubella , Uveitis, Anterior , Uveitis , Zika Virus Infection , Zika Virus , Chikungunya Fever/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Humans , Rubella/epidemiology , Uveitis, Anterior/epidemiology
9.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood) ; 246(23): 2495-2501, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34279137

ABSTRACT

In this cross-sectional study, we investigate the presence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Ribonucleic Acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in the tears of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. After laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis, tear samples from both eyes of each patient were collected using conjunctival swab for RT-PCR. Detailed demographic profile, systemic and ocular symptoms, comorbidities, clinical, ancillary, and ocular manifestations were evaluated. Of the 83 patients enrolled in the study, 7 (8.43%) had SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected in the tear samples. Neutrophils' count, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer were higher in patients with SARS-CoV-2 detected in tears than in patients without virus in ocular surface samples. One patient with SARS-CoV-2 in tears showed mild ocular eyelid edema, hyperemia, and chemosis. No relevant ocular manifestations were detected in the other patients. Although the levels of viral RNA on ocular surface samples were low for most patients (5/7), with positivity only for gene N and CT higher than 30, two patients were positive for all viral targets tested (N, E, and RpRd), with viral load near 1 × 105 ePFU/mL, indicating that the ocular transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is a possibility that needs to be considered, especially in the hospital environment. Further studies need to be conducted to demonstrate whether infective viral particles could be isolated from tears.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/virology , Eye Infections, Viral/virology , Eye/virology , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Adult , Aged , Brazil , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/pathology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/statistics & numerical data , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Viral/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Tears/virology , Viral Load
10.
Cornea ; 40(8): 943-949, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34029242

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: This brief definitive review of herpes zoster (HZ) will cover the current state of knowledge and questions that remain to be answered regarding HZ in general and HZ ophthalmicus in particular. A question-and-answer format will be used to address various important topics related to this common and serious disease. Questions to be addressed relate to common misconceptions, contagiousness of infection, unknowns regarding pathogenesis, rising incidence, risk factors and complications, relationship with temporal arteritis, vaccination, and current and future antiviral treatment. In addition, the importance of the Zoster Eye Disease Study to determine the efficacy of suppressive valacyclovir treatment in preventing complications of HZ ophthalmicus and the need to support enrollment will be discussed.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Eye Infections, Viral/therapy , Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus/therapy , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/therapeutic use , Herpes Zoster/genetics , RNA, Viral/analysis , Vaccination/methods , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Viral/virology , Global Health , Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus/epidemiology , Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus/virology , Humans , Incidence
12.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 69(3): 488-509, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33595463

ABSTRACT

The pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has had health implications of unprecedented magnitude. The infection can range from asymptomatic, mild to life threatening respiratory distress. It can affect almost every organ of the body. Ophthalmologists world over are reporting various manifestations of the infection in the eye. This review was undertaken to help ophthalmologists recognize the possible manifestations and the stage of the viral disease when they commonly appear. Literature search was performed for the publications on ophthalmic manifestations of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) between January 1, 2020 and January 31, 2021. 46 case reports, 8 case series, 11 cross sectional/cohort observational studies, 5 prospective interventional studies, 3 animal models/autopsy studies and 6 reviews/meta-analysis were included. Conjunctivitis is the most common manifestation and can develop at any stage of the disease. Direct effect due to virus, immune mediated tissue damage, activation of the coagulation cascade and prothrombotic state induced by the viral infection, the associated comorbidities and drugs used in the management are responsible for the findings in the eye. The viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) has been isolated from ocular tissues but the role of eye as a route for infection is yet to be substantiated. Ophthalmic manifestations may be the presenting feature of COVID-19 infection or they may develop several weeks after recovery. Ophthalmologists should be aware of the possible associations of ocular diseases with SARS-CoV-2 in order to ask relevant history, look for specific signs, advise appropriate tests and thereby mitigate the spread of infection as well as diagnose and initiate early treatment for life and vision threatening complications.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Viral/etiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/complications , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Humans
13.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 69(3): 691-694, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33595502

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and various types of ophthalmic manifestation of patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study conducted on patients with SARS-Co-V-2 infection, at a dedicated tertiary COVID-19 hospital in South India from April 1 to July 31, 2020. At the time of their admission to the COVID hospital, demographic data such as name, age, sex was recorded. A thorough history regarding the onset, duration, progression, nature of symptoms and its associated factors, medication history, treatment history were elicited and documented. Ocular examination was performed under torchlight by an ophthalmologist posted for COVID duty. Further investigations including imaging were sought for, depending on clinical indications. Serial follow-up examinations of all patients were carried out every 72 hours or when patients complained of any ocular symptoms whichever earlier, until discharge. All relevant data were compiled and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2742 patients were examined. Of them, 1461 (53.28%) were males and 1281 (46.72%) were females. The mean age (±SD) was 39.46 ± 17.63 years. None of the patients in our study had any ocular symptoms or signs as the presenting complaint at the time of their admission. On subsequent follow-up, only 20 (0.72%) developed ocular manifestations, of which 19 (95%) had features suggestive of Bilateral viral conjunctivitis. However, 1 (5%) patient had orbital cellulitis secondary to pansinusitis. CONCLUSION: Ophthalmic manifestations in the clinical spectrum of COVID-19 infection are uncommon and unlikely to be the presenting clinical impression. However, it has broadened our view to a wider spectrum of COVID-19 presentations enhancing our clinical acumen for staunch detection of COVID-19 suspects in our daily practice, augmenting early diagnosis and management and also break the chain of transmission for the greater good of humanity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Conjunctivitis, Viral/etiology , Eye Infections, Viral/etiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Conjunctivitis, Viral/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis, Viral/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Viral/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
15.
Eye (Lond) ; 35(4): 1117-1139, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33514902

ABSTRACT

Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) are an increasing threat to public health on a global scale. In recent times, the most prominent outbreaks have constituted RNA viruses, spreading via droplets (COVID-19 and Influenza A H1N1), directly between humans (Ebola and Marburg), via arthropod vectors (Dengue, Zika, West Nile, Chikungunya, Crimean Congo) and zoonotically (Lassa fever, Nipah, Rift Valley fever, Hantaviruses). However, specific approved antiviral therapies and vaccine availability are scarce, and public health measures remain critical. Patients can present with a spectrum of ocular manifestations. Emerging infectious diseases should therefore be considered in the differential diagnosis of ocular inflammatory conditions in patients inhabiting or returning from endemic territories, and more general vigilance is advisable in the context of a global pandemic. Eye specialists are in a position to facilitate swift diagnosis, improve clinical outcomes, and contribute to wider public health efforts during outbreaks. This article reviews those emerging viral diseases associated with reports of ocular manifestations and summarizes details pertinent to practicing eye specialists.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases, Emerging/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Viral/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Animals , Arthropod Vectors , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Humans , RNA Viruses/pathogenicity , Viral Zoonoses , Virus Diseases/epidemiology
16.
Cornea ; 40(8): 967-971, 2021 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33009093

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the demographic features and clinical characteristics of patients with herpes keratitis (HK) and limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) and identify possible factors associated with development of LSCD after HK. METHODS: In this retrospective case-series study, records of patients with a clinical diagnosis of HK seen at Massachusetts Eye and Ear over a 5-year period were reviewed for evidence of LSCD. Patient demographics, medical history, treatment, and best-corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) were recorded. RESULTS: We identified 626 patients with HK. Fifty-seven had been diagnosed with LSCD (9.3%). Thirteen percent of patients with herpes zoster keratitis (N= 25) and 7% of patients with herpes simplex keratitis (N= 32) had LSCD (P = 0.01). Keratitis caused by herpes zoster virus [odds ratios (OR), 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.97-3.19; P = 0.01], stromal involvement (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.27-4.18; P = 0.02), and the use of topical antihypertensives (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.27-4.18; P = 0.02) were found to be associated with a higher likelihood of developing LSCD. The final logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) BCVA was significantly lower in patients with LSCD compared with those without LSCD with a mean BCVA of 1.34 ± 1.52 LogMar (∼20/200) as compared to 0.18 ± 0.54 LogMar (∼20/30 ± 20/60) in those patients without LSCD (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that HK may be a risk factor for development of LSCD. Patients with HK should be monitored for the development of LSCD to reduce the risk of chronic ocular surface morbidity.


Subject(s)
Corneal Diseases/etiology , Eye Infections, Viral/complications , Keratitis, Herpetic/complications , Limbus Corneae/pathology , Visual Acuity , Corneal Diseases/diagnosis , Corneal Diseases/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Viral/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Keratitis, Herpetic/diagnosis , Keratitis, Herpetic/epidemiology , Male , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Morbidity/trends , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors
17.
J Optom ; 14(2): 114-119, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32763128

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus family is a group of zoonotic viruses with some recognized reservoirs particularly some bats. A novel coronavirus emerged in the province of Wuhan (China) in December of 2019.The number of infected patient with serious respiratory infection quickly spread around the world to become a global pandemic. The clinical presentation and viral pathogenesis of the coronavirus disease named COVID-19 indicated that the virus is transmitted from person to person through infected droplets entering the respiratory mucosa. Close contact with infected individuals particularly in crowded environments has characterized the rapid spread of the infection. Clinical manifestations of the viral infection have mentioned the presence of some ocular findings such as conjunctival congestion, conjunctivitis and even corneal injury associated with the classical COVID-19 infection. Some animal models of different coronaviruses eye infections have described the viral pathogenesis through tear and conjunctival sampling. On the other hand, we are recommended protective measure to prevent contagion and limit the spread of the virus in health care professionals and contact lenses wearers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Conjunctivitis, Viral/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Eye , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Tears/virology , Animals , Conjunctivitis, Viral/diagnosis , Disease Models, Animal , Eye Infections, Viral/diagnosis , Humans
18.
Int Ophthalmol ; 41(2): 433-440, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32929665

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused a global pandemic with millions infected worldwide. Little is known on the ocular involvement associated with the disease. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and molecular ocular involvement among patients with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary care facility. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted to the COVID-19 Ward of the Shamir Medical Center in Israel during March and April, 2020 were included. The control group included patients negative for COVID-19 admitted during a similar period to a different ward. Patients were examined by trained Ophthalmologists. SARS-CoV-2 conjunctival swab samples were obtained. RESULTS: Included were 48 patients, 16 with confirmed COVID-19 and 32 controls. Median patient age was 68.5 (interquartile range: 31.5, mean: 63 ± 21) years and 48% were male. Active conjunctival injection was present in three patients (19%) with COVID-19, compared to none in the controls (p = 0.034). Patients with COVID-19 were more likely to complain of foreign body sensation (31.3% vs 3.1%, p = 0.005) and redness of the eye (25% vs 0%, p = 0.003). Conjunctival injection was associated with loss of smell and taste (75% vs 7.7%, p = 0.018). Viral conjunctival swab tests all showed negative results for all three viral genes tested (E, N, and RdRp). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients admitted to a tertiary referral center with confirmed COVID-19, active conjunctival injection was noted in one out of five cases, and was associated with loss of smell and taste. Conjunctival swabs for viral RNA were negative in patients with and without ocular involvement.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Pandemics , RNA, Viral/analysis , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Aged , Eye Infections, Viral/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Viral/virology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Israel/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
19.
Ocul Immunol Inflamm ; 29(2): 299-307, 2021 Feb 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31697216

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To identify potential diagnostic biomarkers for herpetic and syphilitic uveitis.Methods: Blood samples were collected from 92 uveitis patients. Concentrations of 47 biomarkers were evaluated in unstimulated Quantiferon supernatants using the Luminex platform.Results: Results showed 11 patients (12%) had herpetic uveitis, 11 (12%) syphilis, 40 (43.5%) other infectious causes, 16 (17.4%) established noninfectious causes and 14 (15.2%) were idiopathic. Biomarker analysis revealed three proteins (Apo-A1, Apo-CIII, CRP) that differed between syphilis and other causes. A three-marker biosignature (CCL4/MIP-1ß, Apo-CIII and CRP) separated syphilis from other groups with AUC = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.68-0.98). Apo-CIII and CRP differed between herpetic cases and other groups (p < .05). A three-analyte biosignature (Apo-A1, SAP and CRP) separated the herpetic group from other groups with AUC = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.65-0.93).Conclusion: We have identified candidate biomarkers with potential to differentiate between herpetic, syphilitic and other causes of uveitis. These results warrant further investigation in larger future studies.


Subject(s)
Eye Infections, Bacterial/blood , Eye Infections, Viral/blood , Eye Proteins/blood , Syphilis/blood , Uveitis/blood , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Eye Infections, Bacterial/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Bacterial/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Viral/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Viral/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , South Africa/epidemiology , Syphilis/diagnosis , Uveitis/diagnosis , Uveitis/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...